Commercial EV range explained: WLTP vs real-world in Singapore.
Two electric trucks sit side by side. One claims 300 km WLTP. The other says from 230 km at full load. A buyer reasonably concludes the first goes further. Often it doesn't — the two numbers are measuring different things, under different conditions, and in some cases under different regulations entirely. This is the single most misread figure in commercial EV purchasing, and it is worth ten minutes before you shortlist anything.
In short. WLTP measures EV range in a laboratory at about 23 °C, roughly a quarter payload, with no air-conditioning. A full-load figure measures the same vehicle under the hardest condition. In Singapore, full payload and continuous air-conditioning can reduce a WLTP figure by 20 % to 35 %.
Key takeaways: WLTP vs full-load commercial EV range
- · WLTP is a laboratory test at roughly a quarter payload, around 23°C, usually without air-conditioning. It is a fair basis for comparing vehicles to each other — not a prediction of what a loaded truck will do.
- · A "full load" figure is the same vehicle measured honestly under the hardest condition. It looks worse and usually isn't.
- · WLTP stops at 3.5 tonnes. Heavier trucks have no WLTP figure at all, which is why they appear to underperform vans on paper.
- · "City" figures flatter. One van in our directory reads 485 km city and 313 km combined — same battery, same van.
- · 200–250 km fully loaded is the realistic working norm for commercial EVs today.
What WLTP actually measures
Definition. WLTP — the Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure — measures electric vehicle range in laboratory conditions at approximately 23 °C, at roughly 25 % of maximum payload, with air-conditioning generally off. It is a comparison benchmark between vehicles, not a forecast of what a loaded fleet vehicle will achieve on the road.
the older NEDC cycle precisely because NEDC had become notoriously optimistic. WLTP is more realistic — but it remains a laboratory procedure, and the conditions matter.
The vehicle runs on a chassis dynamometer — a rolling road — following a fixed speed profile in four phases of increasing speed. Ambient temperature is controlled at approximately 23°C. There is no wind, no gradient, no traffic and no cargo shifting about.
The detail that matters most to a fleet buyer, and which almost never appears in marketing material, is the test mass. WLTP does not test a fully loaded vehicle. The vehicle is tested at its mass in running order plus approximately 25% of its payload capacity. A van rated to carry 1,200 kg is therefore measured carrying around 300 kg.
Air-conditioning is generally not running during the test. In Singapore, it always is.
None of this makes WLTP dishonest. It is a standardised, repeatable test, and standardisation is exactly what lets you compare two vans meaningfully. The error is treating a comparison benchmark as an operational forecast.
Why heavy electric trucks look worse than they are
WLTP applies to light commercial vehicles — broadly, up to 3.5 tonnes gross vehicle weight. Above that, the procedure simply does not apply.
So a 7.5-tonne electric truck has no WLTP figure to quote. Nor does a 19-tonne one. Manufacturers in these classes state a declared figure instead, and the responsible ones state the condition alongside it — at full load, or at a specified gross combination weight.
This produces a perverse effect on a comparison table. The light van quotes a lab figure at quarter load. The heavy truck quotes a real figure at full load. The van looks dramatically better. In service the gap is far narrower than the numbers suggest, because the two figures were never measuring the same thing.
A worked example from our own directory. The JAC N75EV is a 7.49-tonne truck, and its manufacturer states from 230 km at full load. Note both qualifiers: from, meaning that is the floor rather than the expectation, and at full load, meaning the hardest case. Read casually, "230 km" looks poor next to a van's "350 km WLTP". Read properly, the truck is being described far more conservatively.
WLTP city vs combined range — the one-third gap
The WLTP cycle runs in phases — low, medium, high and extra-high speed. Quote only the low-speed urban phases and you get a "city" figure. Average all of them and you get "combined".
Electric vehicles are at their most efficient in slow urban running, because regenerative braking returns energy to the battery every time the vehicle slows. So the city figure is always the higher of the two, sometimes dramatically.
Real figures from vehicles listed on this site:
| Vehicle | WLTP city | WLTP combined | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maxus eDeliver 7 | 485 km | 313 km | −35% |
| Maxus eDeliver 5 | 489 km | 339 km | −31% |
| Qingling EQ2 | 515 km | 350 km | −32% |
| Citroën ë-Berlingo | 492 km | 354 km | −28% |
A third of the range disappears between the two columns, on the same vehicle with the same battery. If a supplier quotes you one number without saying which it is, ask.
How Singapore’s climate and traffic affect EV range
Three local factors pull in different directions.
- · Air-conditioning costs you range. It runs year-round here, and in an EV it draws directly from the traction battery — there is no waste engine heat to borrow. Expect to give up somewhere in the region of 5 to 15%. WLTP does not account for this.
- · Stop-start traffic helps. Every deceleration returns charge. Congestion that punishes a diesel is comparatively kind to an electric drivetrain, which is why the city figure is the higher one.
- · Route lengths are short. Singapore is roughly 50 km end to end. A great many fleet duty cycles never come close to the limits of a 200 km vehicle, which is why range is frequently not the binding constraint at all.
In practice, the constraint that decides most Singapore fleet electrification projects is not vehicle range. It is depot charging access and electrical capacity — whether you can get sufficient power to the vehicles overnight, and what the grid connection at your site will support.
4 questions to ask commercial EV suppliers in Singapore
Four questions that make a quoted range figure meaningful:
- · Is that WLTP, or a manufacturer-declared figure? If it is above 3.5 tonnes, it cannot be WLTP.
- · City or combined? Assume city unless told otherwise — it is the more flattering number and the more commonly quoted.
- · At what load? WLTP is about a quarter payload. Ask what the figure looks like fully loaded.
- · Was air-conditioning running? Almost certainly not. Budget for it.
A supplier who answers all four plainly is worth more of your attention than one quoting the largest available number.
How EVhubs publishes commercial EV range figures
We take the figures from each manufacturer's own specification sheet and keep the conditions attached to them:
- · Where a manufacturer publishes both city and combined, we show both.
- · Where the load condition is stated, we state it — which is why the JAC reads "from 230 km (N75EV at full load)" rather than a bare number.
- · Where a figure is not published, the listing says so rather than estimating.
Ranges remain subject to homologation for Singapore LTA Vehicle Type Approval, and real-world results vary with load, route, temperature and driving style. We publish specifications, not promises.
Related reading for Singapore fleet buyers
Electric truck buyer’s guide 2026
An independent market scan of the commercial-EV options available to Singapore fleets.
Read the guide →
Singapore EV grants tracker
HVZES, EHVCG, CVES and the rest — eligibility, windows and how they stack.
Open the tracker →
Are electric vans worth it in Singapore?
A five-year total cost of ownership and carbon comparison against diesel.
Read the analysis →
Compare the figures yourself
Every model in the directory carries its manufacturer's full specification, with range conditions stated where the manufacturer states them. Put any two side by side.
Note on sources. Range figures cited are taken from manufacturers' published specification sheets for models listed on EVhubs. WLTP test-mass and phase descriptions reflect the procedure as applied to light commercial vehicles; individual manufacturers may test to slightly different configurations within it. This article is general guidance for fleet buyers and is not a substitute for the manufacturer's own specification for a given vehicle and body configuration.